Ana Akım Konjonktür Teorileri ve 2007 Küresel Finansal Krizi

4.075 1.425


2007 Global Financial Crisis has caused huge economic and financial consequences that cannot be compared to those experienced during the 1929 Great Depression. It was not surprising that mainstream (orthodox) economic theories were not able to predict the 1929 Great Depression since the dominant economic paradigm at that time depended theoretically on Say’s Law arguing that persistent economic crises are alien to free market economies. After the 1929 experience that shook up Say’s Law, Orthodox Keynesian, Orthodox Monetary, New Classical, Real Business and New Keynesian mainstream business cycles theories have been developed. Despite the theoretical and mathematical elegance of these theories, they all fail to understand, explain and predict the 2007 Global Financial Crisis. This unexpected situation has not only brought into question the performance of the mainstream business cycles theories but also damaged the scientific quality of economics as a social science today. Consequently the very failure of mainstream economics has opened up more space for the heterodox economics to maneuver that have been out of the sight for almost a century. Notably Post Keynesian and Austrian business cycles theories that are heterodox in character become popular in business cycles debates. This piece of work mainly tries to understand why the mainstream economics failed in 2007 Global Financial Crisis and proposes the review and the extension of the mainstream economic paradigm so that it benefits from the experiences of heterodox branches of economics


2007 Global Financial Crisis, Mainstream Business Cycles Theories, Heterodox Business Cycles Theories

Full Text:

PDF (Türkçe)



Bank, Z., 2011. İktisat Teorisinde Denge Tartışmaları, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, (Tez Danışmanı: Ersan Bocutoğlu), Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

Bigo,V.,2008. Explaining Modern Economics (As a Microcosmos of Society), Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2008,32: 527-554.

Bocutoğlu, E., Ekinci, A.2009. Genel Teori, Küresel Krizler ve Yeniden Maliye Politikası, Maliye Dergisi, Sayı 156, Ocak-Haziran 2009: 66-82.

Bocutoğlu, E., Ekinci, A. 2010a. Küresel Krize Farklı Bir Teorik Çerçeve: Avusturyacı Konjonktür Teorisi, Bankacılar Dergisi, Sayı:73: 20-34.

Bocutoğlu, E., Ekinci, A. 2010b. Austrian Business Cycles Theory and Global Crisis, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Daily.

Bocutoğlu, E. 2010. Hyman P. Minsky’nin Konjonktür Teorisi 2007-2010 Küresel Krizini Açıklamaya Uygun mu?: Heterodoks Bir Değerlendirme, Bankacılar Dergisi, Sayı:75: 3-33.

Bocutoğlu, E., Ekinci, A. 2011. Austrian Business Cycles Theory and Global Financial Crisis: Some Lessons for Macroeconomic Risk and Financial Stability, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Working Papers.

Bocutoğlu, E. 2011. Krizin Makro İktisadından Makro İktisadın Krizine: Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme, Ercan Uygur (Editör), Küresel Bunalım ve İktisat Eğitimi, Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu, İmaj Yayınevi, Ankara.

Bocutoğlu, E. 2012a. İktisadi Düşünceler Tarihi, Murathan Yayınevi, İkinci Baskı, Trabzon.

Bocutoğlu, E. 2012b. Makro İktisat: Teoriler ve Politikalar, On Birinci Baskı, Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa.

Bocutoğlu, E. 2013. Karşılaştırmalı Makro İktisat: Teoriler ve Politikalar, Altıncı Baskı, Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa.

Bocutoğlu,E.,2014. ABD’de Glass-Steagall Yasasının Yürürlükten Kaldırılması 2007 Küresel Finansal Krizini Tetikledi mi?: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirme, Bankacılar Dergisi, Sayı 90: 83-111.

Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C.J., Leeson, P.T, 2014. Earw(h)ig: I can’t Hear You Because Your Ideas Too Old, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38: 531-544.

Cameron, J., Siegman, K.A., 2012. Why Did Mainstream Economics Miss the Crisis? The Role of Epistemological and Methodological Blinkers, On the Horizon Vol.20, Issue:3: 164-171.

Cansen, E., 20014. Keder İktisatçıların Kaderidir, Sözcü, 21 Ağustos 2014.

Colander, D., Föllmer, H., Haas A., Goldberg, M., Juselius K., Kirman A., Lux, T. ve Sloth B.,2009. The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of Academic Economics, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Working Paper No:1489.

Çakır, N.,1998. Physics and Economics, Capital Markets Board of Turkey, Publication number: 114, Ankara.

Greenspan, A. 2008. Türbülans Çağı: Yeni Bir Dünya Serüveni, İstanbul: Boyner Yayınları.

Itoh, M., Lapavitsas, K.1999. Political Economy of Money and Finance, McMillan Press Limited, New York.

Kindleberger, C.P, Aliber, R. 2005. Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises, The Fifth Editon, John Wiley and Sons.

Krugman, P., 2009. The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008, WW Norton.

Kuttner, R. 2013. Seven Deadly Sins of Deregulation and Three Necessary Reforms, The American Prospect,

Lawson,T., 2009. The Current Economic Crisis: Its Nature and the Course of Academic Economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2009, 33: 759-777.

The National Commission, 2011. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report, Official Government Edition, FCIC Website.

Roubini, N., ve Mihm, S. 2012. Kriz Ekonomisi, Dünya Ekonomisinin Çöküşü ve Geleceği, (Çeviren: Işıl Tezcan), Pegasus Yayınları: 422, Ekonomi: 3., İstanbul.

Semmler, W., Gong, G., 2008. Keynes and Modern Macroeconomics, METU Studies in Development, (38) June: 29-59.

Shiller, R. J., 2008. The Subprime Solution, Princeton University Press.

Soros, G., 2014. Anatomy of a Crisis, 22.08. 2014.

Tovar, C. E., 2009. DSGE Models and Central Banks, economics-The Open Access, Open Assessment E-journal, No: 16: 1-31.